Fabry disease with early-onset ventricular dilation: A case report.

RATIONALE: The most common cardiac involvement of Fabry disease (FD) is left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), which usually occurs in male patients over the age of 30. In rare cases, it can progress to ventricular dilation in the late stage of the disease. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 16-year-old boy presenting with recurrent extremity pain and chest distress was admitted to our hospital. Imaging examinations revealed ventricular dilation. DIAGNOSIS: α-Galactosidase A enzyme assay and GLA gene sequencing confirmed the diagnosis of FD and revealed a novel mutation c.76_77insT. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated using metoprolol (23.75 mg qd) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (fosinopril sodium 5 mg qd). He refused enzyme replacement therapy for financial reasons. OUTCOMES: The echocardiography, electrocardiography, renal function, and routine blood and urine tests performed 20 months after the patients discharge from hospital showed no significant changes. The patient reported a slow and gradual decrease in the frequency and degree of pain and chest distress, starting approximately 24 months after discharge. LESSONS: Cardiac involvement of FD can progress rapidly in some cases. Screening for FD should be considered in patients with unexplained ventricular dilation, especially in those with a history of typical FD manifestations.

Coexistence of Fabry disease with IgM nephropathy: A case report.

RATIONALE: Coexistence of Fabry disease and IgM nephropathy is rare. The varying severity and unapparent clinical manifestation of Fabry disease makes it difficult to recognize when coexisting with another more prevalent cause of nephropathy requiring electron microscopy and genetic testing to confirm their coexistence. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 54-year-old female presented with proteinuria without any clinical signs or family history of Fabry disease. DIAGNOSES: Immunostaining of the renal biopsy identified mesangial IgM deposition diagnosing it as IgM nephropathy. The light microscopy indicated prominent vacuolization of podocytes. Further examination of toluidine blue stained semi-thin sections and electron microscopy revealed blue bodies and myelin bodies in the cytoplasm of podocytes, respectively. Mutation analysis detected missense mutation establishing the diagnosis of coexisting Fabry disease. INTERVENTIONS: The patient was treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. Enzyme replacement therapy was not administered due to financial constraints. OUTCOMES: After 2 months of treatment the patient demonstrated urine protein to creatinine ratio of 0.21 g/g. LESSONS: Identifying coexistence of Fabry disease with other nephropathy requires meticulous pathologic investigations including electron microscopy especially when Fabry disease presents with atypical phenotype.

Budget Impact Analysis of Eliglustat for the Treatment of Gaucher Disease Type 1 in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is a rare, genetic, lysosomal storage disease with no cure. Current treatment options include intravenous (IV) enzyme replacement therapy ([ERT]; imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, or taliglucerase alfa) or oral substrate reduction therapy ([SRT]; eliglustat or miglustat). The cost to U.S. payers of an IV-administered drug can vary depending on the site of care (i.e., home, outpatient clinic, or hospital setting). Treatment with oral eliglustat may present an opportunity for cost savings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the budget impact from a U.S. payer perspective associated with transitioning patients receiving ERTs to the oral SRT eliglustat for the treatment of adults with GD1. METHODS: A budget impact model estimated the change in pharmaceutical and administration costs resulting from increasing the market share of eliglustat from 12% (current) to 44% (new). The market share for eliglustat was drawn equally from existing shares of imiglucerase (40%) and velaglucerase alfa (40%) and assumed to be static over the analysis period. ERT costs were adjusted to account for site of care-based markup and the proportion of patients receiving infusions in each site of care (home, infusion center, or hospital outpatient). Annual ERT costs were calculated assuming a biweekly dose of 47.4 U per kg, a 72-kg patient weight, and 24 infusions per year. The effect of key variables was tested in the sensitivity analyses. All costs are expressed in 2017 U.S. dollars. RESULTS: In a new plan with 5 million members and 25 GD1 treated patients, increased use of eliglustat resulted in an annual savings of $1,526,710 and a total savings of $4,580,130 (13.6%) over 3 years. The corresponding annual per member per month savings was $0.025. This is further illustrated in the sensitivity and scenario analyses where the use of eliglustat was cost saving in all cases. Shifting more patients receiving ERT in the hospital outpatient setting to eliglustat resulted in increased savings. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these analyses, increased use of eliglustat resulted in meaningful cost savings to a payer's overall budget. Cost savings are highest among patients switching from ERT administered in a hospital outpatient setting. The results suggest that cost savings are also likely achievable from initiating patients on oral eliglustat instead of infusion-based therapy from the outset of treatment. DISCLOSURES: This study was sponsored by Sanofi Genzyme. Evidera received funding from Sanofi Genzyme to conduct this study and prepare the manuscript. The sponsor collaborated on the study design, analysis, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript. Nalysnyk is an employee of and shareholder in Sanofi Genzyme. Ward, Cele, and Uyei are employees of Evidera, which provides consulting and other research services to biopharmaceutical companies. Sugarman was also an Evidera employee when the study was being conducted and the manuscript written. This study was presented as a poster at the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Nexus 2016, October 3-6, 2016; National City, MD, and at the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 22nd Annual International Meeting; May 20-24, 2017; Boston, MA.

Direct costs for nonsurgical management of Chronic Pancreatitis in a tertiary care teaching hospital.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a leading cause of hospitalization among gastrointestinal diseases resulting in considerable financial burden to patients. However the direct costs for nonsurgical management in CP remains unexplored. METHODS: A cross sectional study was carried out (2011-14) in the Department of Gastroenterology, Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, India. Demographic and clinical data on laboratory investigations, interventions and follow up were obtained from the medical records department. Item costs were derived from the hospital electronic billing section. Cost was expressed as median annual cost per patient. RESULTS: 65 (male 48; 73.8%) patients were included. Their median age was 31 (range 12-68) years. The annual median (IQR) total cost per patient was INR 88,892 (70,550.5-116,004); [USD 1410(1119-1841); € 1155(916-1507)], comprising of INR 61,089 (39,102.5-90,360.5) [USD 970 (621-1434); € 793(508-1174)] for outpatient management and INR 32,450 (11,016-46,958) [USD 515 (175-745); €421(143-610)] for hospitalization. 69.5% of the treatment cost was attributed to outpatient treatment. Drugs contributed to 54%, hospitalization incurred 30.5%, investigations 12% and professional fees (3.5%) of the total cost. Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) cost contributed to three-quarters of drug therapy. Use of rabeprazole as against pantoprazole reduced the overall annual cost of therapy by 4%. CONCLUSIONS: This study depicts the first nonsurgical management of accrued direct costs associated with CP due to expensive medications. Due to the high cost for PERT, its usefulness needs proper validation by cost benefit analysis.

[Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Challenges in Multiprofessional Patient Care with Enzyme Replacement Therapy]. / Lysosomale Speichererkrankungen: Herausforderungen bei der sektorübergreifenden, multiprofessionellen Patientenversorgung mit Enzymersatztherapie.

Background Due to their rarity studies in (ultra-) rare diseases are difficult. Only for a minority of these diseases causal therapies are available. Development and production of enzyme replacement therapies (ERT) for example are challenging and expensive. The number of patients is low, costs per patient are high. We will focus on the challenges of providing long-term ERT to patients with lysosomal storage diseases (LSD) in an out- and inpatient setting based on a literature search in Pubmed and own experience. Many ERTs for LSDs have a positive cost-benefit ratio. Possible side-effects are severe allergic reactions. ERT is covered by the insurance companies when prescribed by a physician, however they are liable to recourse by the insurance company as the expenses for drugs of the prescribing physician will be above average. In most cases the recourse can be averted if diagnoses of individual patients are disclosed. Intravenous infusion of ERT is not well-regulated in Germany/Austria. Infusion on a ward is safe however often not covered by the insurance companies as patients do not stay overnight. Another option is infusion in a day-care setting, however the lump sum paid for infusion does not cover costs for ERT. On an individual basis, reimbursement for medication (ERT) has to be negotiated with the insurance companies before infusion takes place. Home infusions are feasible, however careful evaluations of the infusion-team and the risk for side-effects have to be performed on an individual basis, legal issues have to be considered. In- and outpatient ERT of patients with LSDs is challenging but feasible after individual evaluation of patient and infusion team.

COMPARING THE ENZYME REPLACEMENT THERAPY COST IN POST PANCREATECTOMY PATIENTS DUE TO PANCREATIC TUMOR AND CHRONIC PANCREATITIS.

BACKGROUND: Among late postoperative complications of pancreatectomy are the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiencies. The presence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency imposes, as standard treatment, pancreatic enzyme replacement. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, with intractable pain or any complications with surgical treatment, are likely to present exocrine pancreatic insufficiency or have this condition worsened requiring adequate dose of pancreatic enzymes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the required dose of pancreatic enzyme and the enzyme replacement cost in post pancreatectomy patients with and without chronic pancreatitis. METHODS: Observational cross-sectional study. In the first half of 2015 patients treated at the clinic of the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, who underwent pancreatectomy for at least 6 months and in use of enzyme replacement therapy were included in this series. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic pancreatitis prior to pancreatic surgery. For this study, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The annual cost of the treatment was R$ 2150.5 ± 729.39; R$ 2118.18 ± 731.02 in patients without pancreatitis and R$ 2217.74 ± 736.30 in patients with pancreatitis. CONCLUSION: There was no statistically significant difference in the cost of treatment of enzyme replacement post pancreatectomy in patients with or without chronic pancreatitis prior to surgical indication.

Comparing the enzyme replacement therapy cost in post pancreatectomy patients due to pancreatic tumor and chronic pancreatitis

ABSTRACT Background - Among late postoperative complications of pancreatectomy are the exocrine and endocrine pancreatic insufficiencies. The presence of exocrine pancreatic insufficiency imposes, as standard treatment, pancreatic enzyme replacement. Patients with chronic pancreatitis, with intractable pain or any complications with surgical treatment, are likely to present exocrine pancreatic insufficiency or have this condition worsened requiring adequate dose of pancreatic enzymes. Objective - The aim of this study is to compare the required dose of pancreatic enzyme and the enzyme replacement cost in post pancreatectomy patients with and without chronic pancreatitis. Methods - Observational cross-sectional study. In the first half of 2015 patients treated at the clinic of the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery at Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil, who underwent pancreatectomy for at least 6 months and in use of enzyme replacement therapy were included in this series. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee. The patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of chronic pancreatitis prior to pancreatic surgery. For this study, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results - The annual cost of the treatment was R$ 2150.5 ± 729.39; R$ 2118.18 ± 731.02 in patients without pancreatitis and R$ 2217.74 ± 736.30 in patients with pancreatitis. Conclusion - There was no statistically significant difference in the cost of treatment of enzyme replacement post pancreatectomy in patients with or without chronic pancreatitis prior to surgical indication.

RESUMO Contexto - Dentre as complicações pós-operatórias tardias da pancreatectomia estão as insuficiências pancreáticas exócrina e endócrina. O reconhecimento da presença de insuficiência pancreática exócrina impõe, como tratamento padrão, a reposição de enzimas pancreáticas. Pacientes portadores de pancreatite crônica, com dor clinicamente intratável ou com alguma complicação com indicação de tratamento cirúrgico, podem vir a apresentar insuficiência pancreática exócrina ou ter essa condição agravada requerendo adequação de dose de enzimas pancreáticas. Objetivo - O objetivo deste estudo é comparar a dose necessária de enzima pancreática e o custo do tratamento de reposição enzimática em pacientes pancreatectomizados, com e sem pancreatite crônica. Métodos - Estudo transversal observacional. No primeiro semestre de 2015 pacientes acompanhados no ambulatório de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo do HC-FMUSP, submetidos a pancreatectomia há pelo menos 6 meses e em terapia de reposição enzimática foram incluídos nessa casuística. O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos, de acordo com a presença ou ausência de pancreatite crônica prévia à cirurgia pancreática. Para este estudo, P<0,05 foi considerado como estatisticamente significante. Resultados - O custo anual do tratamento foi R$ 2150,51 ± 729,39; R$ 2118,18 ± 731,02 em pacientes sem pancreatite crônica e R$ 2217,74 ± 736,30 em pacientes com pancreatite crônica. Conclusão - Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante no custo do tratamento de reposição enzimática entre pacientes pancreatectomizados com ou sem pancreatite crônica prévia à indicação cirúrgica.

Impact of orphan drugs on Latvian budget.

BACKGROUND: Number of orphan medicinal products on the market and number of rare disease patients, taking these usually expensive products, are increasing. As a result, budget impact of orphan drugs is growing. This factor, along with the cost-effectiveness of orphan drugs, is often considered in the reimbursement decisions, directly affecting accessibility of rare disease therapies. The current study aims to assess the budget impact of orphan drugs in Latvia. METHODS: Our study covered a 5-year period, from 2010 to 2014. Impact of orphan drugs on Latvian budget was estimated from the National Health Service's perspective. It was calculated in absolute values and relative to total pharmaceutical market and total drug reimbursement budget. A literature review was performed for comparison with other European countries. RESULTS: Orphan drug annual expenditure ranged between EUR 2.065 and 3.065 million, with total 5-year expenditure EUR 12.467 million. It constituted, on average, 0.84 % of total pharmaceutical market and 2.14 % of total drug reimbursement budget, respectively. Average annual per patient expenditures varied widely, from EUR 1 534 to EUR 580 952. The most costly treatment was enzyme replacement therapy (Elaprase) for MPS II. Glivec had the highest share (34 %) of the total orphan drug expenditure. Oncological drugs represented more than a half of the total orphan drug expenditure, followed by drugs for metabolic and endocrine conditions and medicines for cardiopulmonary diseases. Three indications: Ph+ CML, MPS II, and PAH accounted for nearly 90 % of the total orphan drug expenditure. CONCLUSIONS: Budget impact of orphan drugs in Latvia is very small. It increased slightly over a period of five years, due to the slight increase in the number of patients and the number of orphan drugs reimbursed. Current Latvian drug reimbursement system is not sufficient for most orphan drugs.

[Shift of focus in the financing of Hungarian drugs. Reimbursement for orphan drugs for treating rare diseases: financing of enzyme replacement therapy in Hungary]. / Hangsúlyeltolódások a hazai gyógyszerek finanszírozásában. A ritka betegségek kezelésére szolgáló árva gyógyszerek támogatása. Enzimpótló kezelések finanszírozása hazánkban.

Focusing on the benefits of patients with rare disease the authors analysed the aspects of orphan medicines financed in the frame of the Hungarian social insurance system in 2012 in order to make the consumption more rational, transparent and predictable. Most of the orphan drugs were financed in the frame of compassionate use by the reimbursement system. Consequently, a great deal of crucial problems occurred in relation to the unconventional subsidized method, especially in the case of the highest cost enzyme replacement therapies. On the base of the findings, proposals of the authors are presented for access to orphan drugs, fitting to the specific professional, economical and ethical aspects of this unique field of the health care system. The primary goal is to provide a suitable subsidized method for the treatment of rare disease patients with unmet medical needs. The financial modification of orphans became indispensible in Hungary. Professionals from numerous fields dealing with rare disease patients' care expressed agreement on the issue. Transforming the orphan medicines' financial structure has been initiated according to internationally shared principles.

JCL Roundtable: enzyme replacement therapy for lipid storage disorders.

There are several inherited disorders that involve abnormal storage of lipids in tissues leading to severe compromise of organs. Sadly, these are often accompanied by lifelong morbidity and early mortality. Disorders such as Gaucher, Fabry, and lysosomal acid lipase deficiencies (Wolman and cholesteryl ester storage diseases) have been known for many years, and provide a difficult and frustrating set of problems for patients, their families, and their physicians. With recombinant methods of protein synthesis, it is now possible to literally replace the defective enzymes that underlie the basic pathophysiology of many such disorders. The delivery of these enzymes into the affected cells is possible because of their location in the lysosomes where the natural degradation of their lipid substrates occurs. I have asked 2 well-known investigators to join us for this Roundtable. These are professors who have been involved with the research that has made this type of therapy possible and who have participated in the clinical trials that demonstrated the value of enzyme replacement therapy. They are Dr. Robert Desnick, dean of Genetic and Genomic Medicine and professor and chairman emeritus of the Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, and Dr. Gregory Grabowski, professor of Microbiology, Biochemistry, and Pediatrics, at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine. Dr. Grabowski recently retired from that school to become the chief science officer of Synageva, a company involved in producing enzymes for this type of therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy with alglucosidase alfa in classic-infantile patients with Pompe disease.

BACKGROUND: Infantile Pompe disease is a rare metabolic disease. Patients generally do not survive the first year of life. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) has proven to have substantial effects on survival in infantile Pompe disease. However, the costs of therapy are very high. In this paper, we assess the cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy in infantile Pompe disease. METHODS: A patient simulation model was used to compare costs and effects of ERT with costs of effects of supportive therapy (ST). The model was filled with data on survival, quality of life and costs. For both arms of the model, data on survival were obtained from international literature. In addition, survival as observed among 20 classic-infantile Dutch patients, who all received ERT, was used. Quality of life was measured using the EQ-5D and assumed to be the same in both treatment groups. Costs included the costs of ERT (which depend on a child's weight), infusions, costs of other health care utilization, and informal care. A lifetime time horizon was used, with 6-month time cycles. RESULTS: Life expectancy was significantly longer in the ERT group than in the ST group. On average, ST receiving patients were modelled not to survive the first half year of life; whereas the life expectancy in the ERT patients was modelled to be almost 14 years. Lifetime incremental QALYs were 6.8. Incremental costs were estimated to be € 7.0 million, which primarily consisted of treatment costs (95%). The incremental costs per QALY were estimated to be € 1.0 million (range sensitivity analyses: € 0.3 million - € 1.3 million). The incremental cost per life year gained was estimated to be € 0.5 million. CONCLUSIONS: The incremental costs per QALY ratio is far above the conventional threshold values. Results from univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed the robustness of the results.

Cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for type 1 Gaucher disease.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) compared to standard medical care without ERT in the Dutch cohort of patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD I). DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a life-time state-transition model of the disease's natural course. Transition probabilities, effectiveness data and costs were derived from retrospective data and prospective follow-up of the Dutch study cohort. SETTING: The tertiary referral center for Gaucher disease in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The Dutch cohort of patients with GD I. INTERVENTION: ERT versus standard medical care without ERT in symptomatic patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Years free of end organ damage (YFEOD) (splenectomy, bone complication, malignancy, multiple complications), quality adjusted life years (QALY), and costs. RESULTS: Over an 85 year lifetime, an untreated GD I patient will generate 48.9 YFEOD and 55.86 QALYs. Starting ERT in a symptomatic patient increases the YFEOD by 12.8 years, while the number of QALYs gained increases by 6.27. The average yearly ERT medication costs range between € 124,000 and € 258,000 per patient. The lifetime costs of ERT starting in the symptomatic stage are € 5,716,473 against € 171,780 without ERT, a difference of € 5,544,693. Consequently, the extra costs per additional YFEOD or per additional QALY are € 434,416 and € 884,994 respectively. After discounting effects by 1.5% and costs by 4% and under a reasonable scenario of ERT unit cost reduction by 25%, these incremental cost-effectiveness ratios could decrease to € 149,857 and € 324,812 respectively. DISCUSSION: ERT is a highly potential drug for GD I with substantial health gains. The conservatively estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are substantially lower than for Pompe and Fabry disease. We suggest that the high effectiveness has contributed importantly to acceptance of reimbursement of ERT for GD I. The present study may further support discussions on acceptable price limits for ultra-orphan products.

Taliglucerase alfa: an enzyme replacement therapy using plant cell expression technology.

Gaucher disease (GD) is a rare, genetic lysosomal storage disorder caused by functional defects of acid ß-glucosidase that results in multiple organ dysfunction. Glycosylation of recombinant acid human ß-glucosidase and exposure of terminal mannose residues are critical to the success of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) for the treatment of visceral and hematologic manifestations in GD. Three commercially available ERT products for treatment of GD type 1 (GD1) include imiglucerase, velaglucerase alfa, and taliglucerase alfa. Imiglucerase and velaglucerase alfa are produced in different mammalian cell systems and require production glycosylation modifications to expose terminal α-mannose residues, which are needed for mannose receptor-mediated uptake by target macrophages. Such modifications add to production costs. Taliglucerase alfa is a plant cell-expressed acid ß-glucosidase approved in the United States and other countries for ERT in adults with GD1. A plant-based expression system, using carrot root cell cultures, was developed for production of taliglucerase alfa and does not require additional processing for postproduction glycosidic modifications. Clinical trials have demonstrated that taliglucerase alfa is efficacious, with a well-established safety profile in adult, ERT-naïve patients with symptomatic GD1, and for such patients previously treated with imiglucerase. These included significant improvements in organomegaly and hematologic parameters as early as 6months, and maintenance of achieved therapeutic values in previously treated patients. Ongoing clinical trials will further characterize the long-term efficacy and safety of taliglucerase alfa in more diverse patient populations, and may help to guide clinical decisions for achieving optimal outcomes for patients with GD1.

A terapia de reposição enzimática pode mudar a frequência de intervenções médicas na mucopolissacaridose tipo I? Um estudo retrospectivo e exploratório / Can enzyme replacement therapy change the frequency of medical interventions in mucopolysaccharidosis type I? An exploratory retrospective study

Introdução: A mucopolissacaridose tipo I (MPS I) é uma doença lisossômica (DL) para a qual está disponível a terapia de reposição enzimática (TRE) com laronidase. Objetivo: caracterizar o efeito da TRE em pacientes com MPS I avaliados por um único centro de referências para DL a partir da análise da frequência de intervenções médicas. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo e exploratório com comparações pré e pós-intervenção. O número/ano/paciente de consultas, medicamentos usados, internações, cirurgias e exames realizados, foi obtido por meio de revisão de prontuário médico. Essas variáveis foram, então, comparadas entre dois períodos: pré-TRE e pós-TRE. Resultados: Nove pacientes (graves=3, atenuados=6) foram incluídos no estudo. A mediana de idade de início da TRE foi 9 anos e a mediana de duração da TRE foi 4 anos. Em média, os pacientes realizaram 90% das infusões previstas para o período. Somente o número de cirurgias/ano/paciente foi dependente do tempo de doença (p=0,0004) e da gravidade do fenótipo (p=0,014). Com relação às comparações pré e pós-TRE, as variáveis que apresentaram diferença significativa (média do número/ano/paciente) foram: exames (pré-TRE=10,2±2,7; pós-TRE=22,5±2,1; p=0,005) e internações (pré-TRE=0,05±0,04; pós-TRE=0,30±0,11; p=0,013). Conclusão: Nossos dados sugerem que a TRE não alterou a história natural da MPS I em relação aos desfechos analisados. Este achado pode ser devido à idade relativamente avançada de início do tratamento no nosso centro.

Background: Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPSI) is a lysosomal disorder (LSD) which can be treated with enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with laronidase. Aim: To describe the effect of ERT on MPSI patients evaluated at a single referral center for LSD by assessing the frequency of medical interventions. Methods: An exploratory, retrospective study with pre- and post-intervention assessments. We reviewed medical records to collect data on the number of medical appointments/year/patient, medications used, hospital admissions, surgeries, and exams performed. These variables were then compared between the pre- and the post-ERT periods.Results: Nine patients (severe=3; attenuated=6) were included in the study.The median age for the start of ERT was 9 years, and the median time on ERT was 4 years. On average, patients received 90% of the infusions predicted for the study period. Only the number of surgeries/year/patient was found to be dependent on length of disease (p=0.0004) and on severity of phenotype (p=0.014). Regarding pre- and post-ERT comparisons, there was a significant difference (mean number/year/patient in exams (pre-ERT, 10.2±2.7; post-ERT, 22.5±2.1; p=0.005) and hospital admissions (pre-ERT, 0.05±0.04; post-ERT, 0.30±0.11; p=0.013). Conclusion: Our data suggest ERT didn’t alter the natural history of MPSI the outcomes assessed in this study. This may be due to the relatively advanced age of patients when they started treatment at our Center.

Swiss national guideline for reimbursement of enzyme replacement therapy in late-onset Pompe disease.

Glycogen storage disease type II is a rare multi-systemic disorder characterised by an intracellular accumulation of glycogen due a mutation in the acid alpha glucosidase (GAA) gene. The level of residual enzyme activity, the genotype and other yet unknown factors account for the broad variation of the clinical phenotype. The classical infantile form is characterised by severe muscle hypotonia and cardiomyopathy leading to early death. The late-onset form presents as a limb girdle myopathy with or without pulmonary dysfunction. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant human GAA (rhGAA) in infants is life saving. In contrast, therapeutic efficacy of rhGAA in the late-onset form is modest. High expenses of rhGAA, on-going infusions and poor pharmacokinetic efficacy raised a discussion of the cost effectiveness of ERT in late-onset Pompe disease in Switzerland. This discussion was triggered by a Swiss federal court ruling which confirmed the reluctance of a health care insurer not to reimburse treatment costs in a 67-year-old female suffering from Pompe disease. As a consequence of this judgement ERT was stopped by all insurance companies in late-onset Pompe patients in Switzerland regardless of their clinical condition. Subsequent negotiations lead to the release of a national guideline of the management of late-onset Pompe disease. Initiation and limitation of ERT is outlined in a national Pompe registry. Reimbursement criteria are defined and individual efficacy of ERT with rhGAA is continuously monitored.